Monday, December 29, 2008

First vertebrate eye to use mirror




















Scientists have discovered a new fish in the deep waters between Samoa and New Zealand, which is the first vertebrate found with eyes that use mirrors, rather than a lens, to focus light.

According to a report in New Scientist, the unusual fish, known as 'Spookfish', actually has just two eyes, but each eye has two parts, one looking upwards and the other down.

The team found that the part looking down uses thousands of tiny reflective crystals acting like mirrors that are angled in slightly different directions to focus light onto the retina. This is completely different to a typical fish eye, which uses a single lens to bend light onto a focal point, similar to the way the human eye works. Other tubular-eyed fish do use optical techniques to look sideways and downwards but these mechanisms have no way to focus light into a clear image.

The spookfish is the only deep-sea fish with eyes that have been shown to produce a focused image when looking both up and down. "This is the first demonstration that vertebrates are not as optically boring as we thought," said Douglas. According to Mike Land from the University of Sussex, UK, the eye is "intriguing" and could be unique to the spookfish. "I doubt we'll see this in other vertebrates. Had it been,we would have surely discovered it by now," he said.

10 ways to destroy EARTH

Whether it took the Earth 4.5 billion years to get to where it is today (or a mere seven days), destroying it might take a lot less time. Sam Hughes presents a host of methods for ending the planet — and life — as we know it. Enjoy!

1 Total existence failure

You will need: nothing

Method: No method. Simply sit back and twiddle your thumbs as, completely by chance, all 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms making up the planet Earth suddenly, simultaneously and spontaneously cease to exist. Note: the odds against this actually ever occurring are considerably greater than a googolplex to one. Failing this, some kind of arcane (read: scientifically laughable) probability-manipulation device may be employed.

Utter, utter rubbish.

2 Feasibility rating: 1/10
Gobbled up by strangelets

You will need: a stable strangelet

Method: Hijack control of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider in Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York. Use the RHIC to create and maintain a stable strangelet. Keep it stable for as long as it takes to absorb the entire Earth into a mass of strange quarks. Keeping the strangelet stable is incredibly difficult once it has absorbed the stabilizing machinery, but creative solutions may be possible.

A while back, there was some media hoo-hah about the possibility of this actually happening at the RHIC, but in actuality the chances of a stable strangelet forming are pretty much zero.

Earth’s final resting place: a huge glob of strange matter.

3 Feasibility rating: 2/10
Sucked into a microscopic black hole

You will need: a microscopic black hole. Note that black holes are not eternal, they evaporate due to Hawking radiation. For your average black hole this takes an unimaginable amount of time, but for really small ones it could happen almost instantaneously, as evaporation time is dependent on mass. Therefore you microscopic black hole must have greater than a certain threshold mass, roughly equal to the mass of Mount Everest. Creating a microscopic black hole is tricky, since one needs a reasonable amount of neutronium, but may possibly be achievable by jamming large numbers of atomic nuclei together until they stick. This is left as an exercise to the reader.

Method: simply place your black hole on the surface of the Earth and wait. Black holes are of such high density that they pass through ordinary matter like a stone through the air. The black hole will plummet through the ground, eating its way to the center of the Earth and all the way through to the other side: then, it’ll oscillate back, over and over like a matter-absorbing pendulum. Eventually it will come to rest at the core, having absorbed enough matter to slow it down. Then you just need to wait, while it sits and consumes matter until the whole Earth is gone.

Highly, highly unlikely. But not impossible.

Earth’s final resting place: a singularity of almost zero size, which will then proceed to happily orbit the Sun as normal.

4 Feasibility rating: 5/10
Blown up by matter/antimatter reaction

You will need: 2,500,000,000,000 tons of antimatter

Antimatter - the most explosive substance possible - can be manufactured in small quantities using any large particle accelerator, but this will take some considerable time to produce the required amounts. If you can create the appropriate machinery, it may be possible - and much easier - simply to “flip” 2.5 trillion tons of matter through a fourth dimension, turning it all to antimatter at once.

Method: This method involves detonating a bomb so big that it blasts the Earth to pieces.

How hard is that?

The gravitational binding energy of a planet of mass M and radius R is - if you do the lengthy calculations - given by the formula E=(3/5)GM^2/R. For Earth, that works out to roughly 224,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Joules. The Sun takes nearly a WEEK to output that much energy. Think about THAT.

To liberate that much energy requires the complete annihilation of around 2,500,000,000,000 tonnes of antimatter. That’s assuming zero energy loss to heat and radiation, which is unlikely to be the case in reality: You’ll probably need to up the dose by at least a factor of ten. Once you’ve generated your antimatter, probably in space, just launch it en masse towards Earth. The resulting release of energy (obeying Einstein’s famous mass-energy equation, E=mc^2) should be sufficient to split the Earth into a thousand pieces.

Earth’s final resting place: A second asteroid belt around the Sun.

Earliest feasible completion date: AD 2500. Of course, if it does prove possible to manufacture antimatter in the sufficiently large quantities you require - which is not necessarily the case - then smaller antimatter bombs will be around long before then.

5 Feasibility rating: 5/10
Destroyed by vacuum energy detonation

You will need: a light bulb

Method: This is a fun one. Contemporary scientific theories tell us that what we may see as vacuum is only vacuum on average, and actually thriving with vast amounts of particles and antiparticles constantly appearing and then annihilating each other. It also suggests that the volume of space enclosed by a light bulb contains enough vacuum energy to boil every ocean in the world. Therefore, vacuum energy could prove to be the most abundant energy source of any kind. Which is where you come in. All you need to do is figure out how to extract this energy and harness it in some kind of power plant - this can easily be done without arousing too much suspicion - then surreptitiously allow the reaction to run out of control. The resulting release of energy would easily be enough to annihilate all of planet Earth and probably the Sun too.

Slightly possible.

Earth’s final resting place: a rapidly expanding cloud of particles of varying size.

Earliest feasible completion date: 2060 or so.

6 Feasibility rating: 6/10
Sucked into a giant black hole

You will need: a black hole, extremely powerful rocket engines, and, optionally, a large rocky planetary body. The nearest black hole to our planet is 1600 light years from Earth in the direction of Sagittarius, orbiting V4641.

Method: after locating your black hole, you need get it and the Earth together. This is likely to be the most time-consuming part of this plan. There are two methods, moving Earth or moving the black hole, though for best results you’d most likely move both at once.

Very difficult, but definitely possible.

Earth’s final resting place: part of the mass of the black hole.

Earliest feasible completion date: I do not expect the necessary technology to be available until AD 3000, and add at least 800 years for travel time. (That’s in an external observer’s frame of reference and assuming you move both the Earth and the black hole at the same time.)

7 Feasibility rating: 6/10
Meticulously and systematically deconstructed

You will need: a powerful mass driver, or ideally lots of them; ready access to roughly 2*10^32J

Method: Basically, what we’re going to do here is dig up the Earth, a big chunk at a time, and boost the whole lot of it into orbit. Yes. All six sextillion tons of it. A mass driver is a sort of oversized electromagnetic railgun, which was once proposed as a way of getting mined materials back from the Moon to Earth - basically, you just load it into the driver and fire it upwards in roughly the right direction. We’d use a particularly powerful model - big enough to hit escape velocity of 11 kilometers per second even after atmospheric considerations - and launch it all into the Sun or randomly into space.

Alternate methods for boosting the material into space include loading the extracted material into space shuttles or taking it up via space elevator. All these methods, however, require a - let me emphasize this - titanic quantity of energy to carry out. Building a Dyson sphere ain’t gonna cut it here. (Note: Actually, it would. But if you have the technology to build a Dyson sphere, why are you reading this?) See No. 6 for a possible solution.

If we wanted to and were willing to devote resources to it, we could start this process RIGHT NOW. Indeed, what with all the gunk left in orbit, on the Moon and heading out into space, we already have done.

Earth’s final resting place: Many tiny pieces, some dropped into the Sun, the remainder scattered across the rest of the Solar System.

Earliest feasible completion date: Ah. Yes. At a billion tons of mass driven out of the Earth’s gravity well per second: 189,000,000 years.

8 Feasibility rating: 7/10.
Pulverized by impact with blunt instrument

You will need: a big heavy rock, something with a bit of a swing to it… perhaps Mars

Method: Essentially, anything can be destroyed if you hit it hard enough. ANYTHING. The concept is simple: find a really, really big asteroid or planet, accelerate it up to some dazzling speed, and smash it into Earth, preferably head-on but whatever you can manage. The result: an absolutely spectacular collision, resulting hopefully in Earth (and, most likely, our “cue ball” too) being pulverized out of existence - smashed into any number of large pieces which if the collision is hard enough should have enough energy to overcome their mutual gravity and drift away forever, never to coagulate back into a planet again.

A brief analysis of the size of the object required can be found here. Falling at the minimal impact velocity of 11 kilometers per second and assuming zero energy loss to heat and other energy forms, the cue ball would have to have roughly 60% of the mass of the Earth. Mars, the next planet out, “weighs” in at about 11% of Earth’s mass, while Venus, the next planet in and also the nearest to Earth, has about 81%. Assuming that we would fire our cue ball into Earth at much greater than 11km/s (I’m thinking more like 50km/s), either of these would make great possibilities.

Obviously a smaller rock would do the job, you just need to fire it faster. A 10,000,000,000,000-tonne asteroid at 90% of light speed would do just as well. See the Guide to moving Earth for useful information on maneuvering big hunks of rock across interplanetary distances.

Pretty plausible.

Earth’s final resting place: a variety of roughly Moon-sized chunks of rock, scattered haphazardly across the greater Solar System.

Earliest feasible completion date: AD 2500, maybe?

9 Feasibility rating: 8/10
Eaten by von Neumann machines

You will need: a single von Neumann machine

Method: A von Neumann machine is any device that is capable of creating an exact copy of itself given nothing but the necessary raw materials. Create one of these that subsists almost entirely on iron, magnesium, aluminum and silicon, the major elements found in Earth’s mantle and core. It doesn’t matter how big it is as long as it can reproduce itself exactly in any period of time. Release it into the ground under the Earth’s crust and allow it to fend for itself. Watch and wait as it creates a second von Neumann machine, then they create two more, then they create four more. As the population of machines doubles repeatedly, the planet Earth will, terrifyingly soon, be entirely eaten up and turned into a swarm of potentially sextillions of machines. Technically your objective would now be complete - no more Earth - but if you want to be thorough then you can command your VNMs to hurl themselves, along with any remaining trace elements, into the Sun. This hurling would have to be achieved using rocket propulsion of some sort, so be sure to include this in your design.

So crazy it might just work.

Earth’s final resting place: the bodies of the VNMs themselves, then a small lump of iron sinking into the Sun.

Earliest feasible completion date: Potentially 2045-2050, or even earlier.

10 Feasibility rating: 9/10
Hurled into the Sun

You will need: Earthmoving equipment

Method: Hurl the Earth into the Sun. Sending Earth on a collision course with the Sun is not as easy as one might think; even though you don’t actually have to literally hit the Sun (send the Earth near enough to the Sun (within the Roche limit), and tidal forces will tear it apart), it’s surprisingly easy to end up with Earth in a loopy elliptical orbit which merely roasts it for four months in every eight. But careful planning can avoid this.

This is impossible at our current technological level, but will be possible one day, I’m certain. In the meantime, may happen by freak accident if something comes out of nowhere and randomly knocks Earth in precisely the right direction. Earth’s final resting place: a small globule of vaporized iron sinking slowly into the heart of the Sun.

Earliest feasible completion date: Via act of God: 25 years’ time. Any earlier and we’d have already spotted the asteroid in question. Via human intervention: given the current level of expansion of space technology, 2250 at best.

10 Revolutionary computers

Despite appearances, today’s online world did not spring to life fully formed. Before they were made a major part of our lives, some pioneering computers either had to capture the public’s imagination, establish what could be done by computers, or both. Here, we’ll look at some computers that played, and sometimes continue to play, a major role. - Lamont Wood

The Difference Engine

Charles Babbage lost his knack for talking money out of the British government, which wanted a machine that could generate math tables, and so the computer revolution didn’t begin in England in 1822. (Did you notice the 8 in that date?). Babbage designed an amazing computer, it just did not get built until recently, as replica mechanical computers have since been constructed using Babbage’s original, complex blueprints. They work perfectly.


ENIAC

Being programmable and performing 357 multiplication operations per second, the U.S. Army’s Electronic Numerical Integrator And Computer (ENIAC) hinted at what a computer could do when it was unveiled in 1946. However, it weighed 30 tons, used 17,478 vacuum tubes, consumed 150 kilowatts, and programming involved patch cables and switches.

IBM System/360

With an extensive set of standard peripherals and a range of compatible models at different price points, the S/360 tapped a huge pent-up demand for business computers when IBM brought it out in 1964. Its popularity provided the economic foundation for the modern computer industry.

Datapoint 2200

One of the first single-user computers on the market when it came out in 1970 from the now-defunct Computer Terminal Corp., the Datapoint 2200 lives on in every PC today. CTC convinced fellow start-up Intel to reduce the machine’s processor to a single chip, to combat system heating. Intel ended up adding the chip to its catalog, founding today’s “Intel dynasty” of PC microprocessors. (System heating, alas, remains a problem.)

Xerox PARC Alto

A single-user computer with a graphical interface with windows and icons, a mouse for cursor control, a local hard drive, and an Ethernet connection to the rest of the office and/or world–that probably describes the machine you’re using right now. Those features first came together in the Alto, an experimental machine developed at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) in 1974. Xerox, however, never had the nerve to put the Alto on the market.


TRS-80

Introduced in 1977, Radio Shack figured its original production run of 3,000 could be used as cash registers if they didn’t sell. But sales exceed that projection by a factor of 80. One of the first machines whose documentation was intended for non-geeks, the widespread adoption of the “Trash-80″ led to the first third-party mass personal software market. For the first time, non-geeky high school kids could write programs and make a computer do their bidding.

Apple II

Introduced by Apple Computer in 1977 and kept on the market for an unprecedented 15 years, the Apple II demonstrated conclusively that there was a mass personal computer market. Its pioneering use of color graphics also won it wide following in the education market–and disdain in the business market, which saw color as frivolous.

IBM PC

It was hardly the fastest or slickest microcomputer when it came out in 1981, but it did have those three initials, and it established hardware and software standards in a market whose growth had previously been stymied by fragmentation among competing architectures. The clone, software, and peripheral markets that sprang up around the PC led directly to today’s personal computer ecosystem.

Apple Macintosh

The “computer for the rest of us” raised the bar for the rest of the personal computer industry when it came out in 1984 by abandoning the command-line interface (as used by the PC’s MS-DOS operating system and essentially everyone else) for a graphical user interface. Not only that, it was commercially successful doing so.


IBM Roadrunner

The title of fastest supercomputer has become hard to retain for long, but the current champ is also notable for being the first machine with sustained throughput exceeding a petaflop — more than a quadrillion floating point operations per second. Physically, it’s bigger than the ENIAC computer unveiled in 1946, but, if history is any guide, we’ll see equivalent power on a desktop in a few decades.

Bionic Humans

Scientists are getting closer to creating a bionic human, or at least a $6 million one. Today, we can replicate or restore more organs and various sundry body parts than ever before. From giving sight to the blind to creating a tongue more accurate than any human taste bud, gentlemen, we have the technology. — Maggie Koerth-Baker

Prosthetics for Your Brain

Replacing a part of your brain isn’t as simple as replacing a limb, but in the future it could be. Theodore Berger, a professor at the University of Southern California, created a computer chip that could take the place of the hippocampus, a part of the brain which controls short-term memory and spatial understanding. Frequently damaged by things like Alzheimer’s and strokes, a hippocampus implant could help maintain normal function in people who’d otherwise be severely disabled. Berger is still testing this implant, but he’d like to see more. He even wrote a book, “Toward Replacement Parts for the Brain,” in 2005.

Old Man, New Penis

Erectile dysfunction can take the fun out of a man’s life, but Anthony Atala and his team at Wake Forest University have come up with a method that could put the spring back in many a guy’s, uh, step. In 2006, Atala succeeded in growing new corpora cavernosa, the spongy tissue that fills with blood during an erection, for male rabbits who’d had theirs removed. The new tissue was grown from the rabbits’ own cells and, after a month, the bunnies were back to doing what they do best.

Artificial Cells

Sometimes, when you need to deliver drugs to just the right spot in the body, a pill or an injection won’t cut the mustard. Daniel Hammer, professor of bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania, has a better method: artificial cells, made from polymers, which can mimic the ease with which white blood cells travel through the body. Called c, these fake cells could deliver drugs directly where they’re needed, making it easier and safer to fight off certain diseases, including cancer.

Wearable Kidney

For people with failing kidneys, basic necessities of life like removing toxins from the blood and keeping fluid levels balanced requires hours hooked up to a dialysis machine the size of a clothes dryer. But a new, portable artificial kidney, small and light enough to fit on a belt system, could change that. Despite its small size, the automated, wearable artificial kidney (AWAK), designed by Martin Roberts and David B.N. Lee of UCLA, actually works better than traditional dialysis because it can be used 24 hours a day, seven days a week, just like a real kidney.

Smart Knee

The knee isn’t a part of the body you’d expect to think for itself, but the RHEO, a prosthetic knee developed by MIT artificial intelligence researchers Hugh Herr and Ari Wilkenfeld, really does have a mind of its own. Earlier electronic knee systems usually had to be programmed by a technician when the patient first put them on. The RHEO knee, on the other hand, creates realistic, comfortable motion on its own, by learning the way the user walks and by using sensors to figure out what kind of terrain they’re walking on. The system makes walking with a prosthetic leg easier and less exhausting.

New Limbs

Amputees can now use a prosthetic arm the same way they’d use a real one: By the power of thought. Developed by Dr. Todd Kuiken of the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, the “bionic arm” is connected to the brain by healthy motor nerves that used to run into the patient’s missing limb. These nerves are re-routed to another area of the body, such as the chest, where the nerve impulses they carry can be picked up by electrodes in the bionic arm. When the patient decides to move her hand, the nerves that would have sent the signal to real hand send it to the prosthetic one instead. Now, Dr. Kuiken’s team is working on improving the arm, using surviving sensory nerves to communicate the feeling of temperature, vibration and pressure from the bionic arm to the patient’s brain.

Inhuman Taste

The tongue can be a powerful tool, but also a highly subjective one, said Dean Neikirk, professor of computer and electrical engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. When food companies want to create the same flavor every time, they turn to the electronic tongue, a device developed by Neikirk and his team to analyze liquids and pick out their exact chemical make-up. Neikirk’s tongue uses microspheres, tiny sensors that change color when exposed to a specific targets, such as certain kinds of sugars. The result is a system that can’t replace the person who says, “This tastes good!” but can make sure the chemistry of good taste is reliably replicated.

Portable Pancreas

An artificial pancreas, capable of monitoring a person’s blood sugar and adjusting the level of insulin to meet their body’s needs, will likely be on the market within a few short years, said Aaron Kowalski, director of strategic research projects at the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. Kowalski said the device would initially be a combination of two existing technologies: an insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor. The contraption could help insulin-dependent diabetics lead more normal lives and make it easier for them to avoid the disfiguring and life-threatening side effects of having too little or too much blood sugar.

Re-Grown Bone

Since the 1960s, researchers have known about proteins that can prompt bone tissue to grow its own patches for missing or damaged parts. Unfortunately, that technology never worked perfectly, often growing the wrong type of tissue or growing bone where bone shouldn’t be. In 2005, researchers at UCLA solved the problem, using a specially designed protein capable only of triggering growth in specific types of cells. Called UCB-1, the protein is now used to grow new bone that can fuse and immobilize sections of vertebrae, relieving severe back pain in some patients.


Bionic Eyes

When you’re blind, being able to see even the basics of light, movement and shape can make a big difference. Both the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis, currently in FDA trials, and a system being developed by Harvard Research Fellow Dr. John Pezaris record basic visual information via camera, process it into electronic signals and send it wirelessly to implanted electrodes. The Argus II uses electrodes implanted in the eye, which could help people who’ve lost some of their retinal function. Dr. Pezaris’ system, still in the early stages of research, would bypass the eyes entirely, sending visual data straight to the brain. Both systems will work best with people who could once see because their brains will already know how to process the information. “The visual brain depends on visual experience to develop normally,” Pezaris explained.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

India's old currency Notes

The first set of British India notes were the 'Victoria Portrait' Series issued in denominations of 10, 20, 50, 100, 1000. These were unifaced, carried two language panels and were printed on hand-moulded paper manufactured at the Laverstock Paper Mills (Portals). The security features incorporated the watermark (GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, RUPEES, two signatures and wavy lines), the printed signature and the registration of the notes.



British India Notes facilitated inter-spatial transfer of funds.As a security precaution, notes were cut in half. One set was sent by post. On confirmation of receipt, the other half was despatched by post.













Small Denomination Notes!

The introduction of small denomination notes in India was essentially in the realm of the exigent. Compulsions of the first World War led to the introduction of paper currency of small denominations. Rupee One was introduced on 30th November, 1917 followed by the exotic Rupees Two and Annas Eight. The issuance of these notes was discontinued on 1st January, 1926 on cost benefit considerations. These notes first carried the portrait of King George V and were the precursors of the 'King's Portrait' Series which were to follow.







King's Portrait Series
Regular issues of this Series carrying the portrait of George V were introduced in May, 1923 on a Ten Rupee Note. The King's Portrait Motif continued as an integral feature of all Paper Money issues of British India. Government of India continued to issue currency notes till 1935 when the Reserve Bank of India took over the functions of the Controller of Currency. These notes were issued in denominations of Rs 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 10,000.





Rupees Five - First Note issued by Reserve Bank of India







ComeBack of WALL Is Similiar as of DADA??


As all We Know The Names WALL(Dravid) and DADA(Ganguly) in Cricket Represents Whom.
The Article Is about Their own tactics Before and after their bad times,not a comparison between them.




Both Of them Debuted in the Same Match Against england In Lords !!!



In the Recent Past ,the batting Form of Rahul Dravid is Not Great as of What He is Capable of.Its Part and Parcel of the game that every man had bad times through his Career.But Here its about Whats their tactics after such Worst display.

Coming to Sourav Ganguly,The Batsman Who is Known For His Aggression, Not so best in his Display of aggressive batting after that.The India's Best Captain ,One of the Best Left Handed Batsmen that Ever india had,Has not displayed his Full Potential in his comeback.As An Admirer of his aggressive captaincy,Me too become a fan of him.


In his ComeBack Matches ,He is Not the Same Dada as of past,He wanted to be in the crease for a Longtime Without His Regular Shots.But He stood well and displayed that He Can Score!!

But Sourav in the Past was An attacking Batsman Who is Known for his offside drives,Cutshots and Down the Track Sixes that are pleasant to watch.Fortunately He prevented his offside drives ,but Not all the Kind of shots as he is Capable of,thats really hurted me.


But He Displayed a New Dimension Of ganguly ,thats even also joyful to Watch.A batsmen who Demolished all the Pacers ,Become patient and sensible in his Shot Selection.But the EnterTainer in him is Lost!!!

Getting in to the Game,He had Done A great Job Throught his Career .I am Highlighting the Fact that He is Changed not Failed. But In Cricketing Terms It Was a Remarkable Display that Scoring 1000runs in a Calendar Year.

Coming To Dravid , I wanted To Explain My view about him at the Start of His Career.The Master Stroke Batsman Is not An entertaining Batsman , But In a Country where Cricket Is considered A religion, A batsman Like Him Wont survive.

Intially People(including Myself) disliked him Due To His Stroke Play,Even though he Scored consistently. But Getting In to Cricket as a Sport I realized that He is one of the Best Technical Batsman in the World.

Dravid Displayed Poor Batting form in the Recent SriLanka And Australia Series,But He Always Sticked To the shots What He is Capable of.Even Many of them Suggested Him that Try to Score fastly rather than His defensive Strokes at the start of innings.

But A Batsman Who Is totally dependent on his Technique and strokePlay wont want to Let them Off. But the Result Is not So Far,He Scored Century In the 2nd Test Match Against England,Displayed The Shots thats What He is Known for and is Criticised for .

He Scored His first Six Runs For 36 balls,An Indian Cricket Fan Wont Like Such display at all.But He Constructed the Game Very cleverly and gradually.Then He started Scoring Runs With his Offdrive,square drive,Straight drive in A Slow Manner.


But HE Sticked to his technique and shot selection as in the Past.He Remain The Same as what he is!!!

But the Fact that is Very similar to both of them is,Both two lost their form after Captaining India And resigned(sacked) their captaincy.

As for as Cricket,Both of them Stood well After their Worst times But in Different Dimension.
As an Indian Fan One Would Definitely definitely Miss Dada's Skills Of Agressive Batting!!!!!




But Fortunately Dravid Remained what Persons Like Me Wanted in him as of cricketing terms!!!!!

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

VEERU-THE DAZZLER

Virender Sehwag -India's Most attacking opening Batsman,Who paved the Way for India's Victory in The Ongoing Home Series Against England,scored 83 runs from 68.He Reached 50 in just 32 balls.
Sehwag
is a Kind of Batsman Who Doesnt Care about The type of pitch or The Bowler or The Field,
If his mind is set then No one Can Stop him.

There Are Some Proofs For his Mind Blowing Entertainment:


1.Sultan of Multan
Sehwag Scored a Triple Ton,who is the 1st Indian To reach The Mile Stone! Against the arch-Rivals Pakistan on their Soil.
Sehwag 's knock came in 364 balls and included 36 fours and six sixes.


2.Home DAZZLER

Virender Sehwag hit the fastest recorded triple-century in Test history on day three of the first Test against South Africa in Chennai.
Virender Sehwag hit the fastest recorded triple-century in Test history on day three of the first Test against South Africa in Chennai.

Matthew Hayden took 362 balls against Zimbabwe in 2003

and Walter Hammond an estimated 355 in New Zealand in 1933.


Sehwag-A Batsman every Team Wanted to Have Such Batsman Who Can Single-Handedly Take Away the Result Of the Game!! In Favour Of his Side.Even Though His Shots are criticised and he is stamped as a batsman having No Footwork and He Suffers Bad Patch Before Australian Series in Australia but He Proved that,He Can Blister even Without Any footwork,but he is improvoising in that too!!

Besides,His Right Arm Offbreak Proved To be Good in the Recent Home Series against Australia ,He took 5 Wickets in the 3rd Test!!And Got The Man of The Match Award!!!

Averaging More than 50 in his Test Career,Havin Much greater Strike Rate For His Test Career.


Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Is DUCKWORTH-LEWIS method easy to understand ????

When i was watching the match between England and India,suddenly i came to know about D/L method.In that match,India batted first but rain played the spoilsport.However after rain has finished its game
India played from 17th over and the match was reduced to 22 overs a side.India scored 166/4 in 22 overs and England needed 198 runs to win in 22 overs.This announcement made by using D/L method.I am writing this to explain D/L method but if u are still cant understand i am sorry that it is confusing me too.


ORIGIN :

This method, devised by Frank Duckworth and Tony Lewis,is a mathematical way of calculating the target score in an ODI or T20 interrupted by any cause.

RULES FOR APPLYING THIS METHOD :

Each team has to face atleast 20 overs in ODI or 5 overs in T20.Then only this method can be applied.

This method depends on two resources.They are 1) The number of overs a team received 2) The number of wickets they had in their hands.

FORMULA TO CALCULATE THE PERCENTAGE :

Z(u,w) = Z0(w)[1-exp{-b(w)u}]


Z(u,w) -----> Expected number of runs to be scored in u overs when w wickets have been lost.

Z0(w) -----> Average total score if an unlimited number of overs overs were available and when w wickets have been lost.

b(w) -----> Decay constant that varies with w,the number of wickets lost.


This formula cant be used without using computers.The software used to calculate this method is CODA ,which is used by ICC officials and has not been released by the governing body to the public domain.




Table 1: Extract from the table of resource percentages remaining

Wickets lost

Overs left

0

2

5

7

9

50

100.0

83.8

49.5

26.5

7.6

40

90.3

77.6

48.3

26.4

7.6

30

77.1

68.2

45.7

26.2

7.6

25

68.7

61.8

43.4

25.9

7.6

20

58.9

54.0

40.0

25.2

7.6

10

34.1

32.5

27.5

20.6

7.5

5

18.4

17.9

16.4

14.0

7.0

Reading the table

The single table applies to all lengths of one-day matches from 50 overs-per-side downwards. Because this length of match is by far the most common, the resources listed in the table are expressed as percentages of those available at the start of a 50-over innings. Thus when there are 50 overs still to be received and no wickets have been lost, the resource percentage available is 100%. A 40-over innings starts with a resource percentage of 90.3% relative to a 50 over innings. An innings shortened to 25-overs before it starts commences with a resource percentage of 68.7% relative to 50-over innings. (Although such innings have only half the overs of a 50-over innings they have all 10 wickets and so have much more than half the resources.)

In order to determine the correct resource percentage the batting side has remaining at any stage of its innings, the number of overs left must be identified. This number of overs left, in conjunction with the number of wickets lost, is then used to read the resource percentage remaining from the table.

For example, suppose that after 20 out of 50 overs a team have lost 2 wickets. They have 30 overs left. From the table you will see that the resource percentage remaining is 68.2%.

Suppose now that there is an interruption in play and 10 overs are lost from the innings. When play can resume there are only 20 overs left but there are still, of course, 2 wickets down, and the table now tells us that the resource percentage remaining is 54.0%. Thus the shortening of the innings has caused the team to lose a resource percentage of 68.2 - 54.0 = 14.2%.

Having started with a resource percentage of 100% and lost 14.2%, then if they complete their innings with no further loss of overs, they will have had a resource percentage available for their innings of 100 - 14.2 = 85.8%.

So simple , isn’t it ?????



Saturday, December 6, 2008

SRIKKANTH Vs DHONI????



http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/010X5yN6M4a32/340x.jpg
From the beginning of IPL, there is a good rapport between Srikkanth and M.S.Dhoni . Srikkanth recommended Dhoni for his Chennai Super Kings team which is owned by Srinivasan ( Treasurer of BCCI) . As he is franchise of the team he understood Dhoni very well.Often he remarked Dhoni as Best captain of India.

The rapport became closer between them after Srikkanth elected as the chairman of Selectors.
But there is a twist in the story.

Chairman of selectors Krish Srikkanth paid a huge compliment to MS Dhoni, calling him the ''best captain in the world''. The comment drew a lot of guffaws from all and sundry. Dhoni has been just one year into the job and is still to face stern tests in his captaincy stint.

Well, Srikkanth does know his cricket and knows the toughest test for a captain comes in his second year. So when someone close to him asked him about the Dhoni comment, Srikkanth had a quick reply. ''What do machan he is not answering my calls since the leak of the selection meeting.

Atleast now I hope he will answer my calls,'' Srikkanth is learnt to have told a close associate. So there you have it Srikkanth is hoping that his praise for Dhoni will atleast make the captain take his calls. What a weird logic, but this is just confirmation of what has been widely speculated. Dhoni did indeed have a tiff with Srikkanth & Co over the exclusion of RP Singh. The meeting witnessed heated arguments which only spilled over in the form of a leak to the section of the media.